Please Read the Case below and briefly answer the following questions.
What’s are the central facts of the case and the assumptions you are making on the bases of these facts?
What is the major overriding issues in this case? (what major questions is use does this case address that merit there its study in this course and in connection with the chapter material you are no covering)
What sub issues are related issues are present in the case that merit consideration and discussion?
Who are the stakeholders in this case and what are their stakes? (what challenges, threats, opportunities are posed by the stakeholders?)
What economic legal, ethical, philanthropic, responsibilities does the company have and what exactly are the nature and extent of these responsibilities?
If the case involves a company’s action, evaluate what the company did or did not do in handling the issue affecting effect it.
What recommendations would you make in this case? If a company’s strategies our actions are involved, should the company have created at did the way I did? What action should the company take now, and why? Be as specific as possible, and include a discussion of alternators you have consider but decided not to pursue. Mention and discuss any important implementation considerations.
Why did the Carlson Company sign the Code of Conduct for the Protection of Children from
Sexual Exploitation in Travel and Tourism? Do you agree with the company’s decision, and why or why not?
What are the advantages and disadvantages to the Carlson Company of developing the hotel
complex in Costa Rica?
What stakeholders would be affected by a decision to develop the hotel complex in Costa
Rica, and how would they be affected? What are their interests and sources of power in this situation?
11. Would developing the hotel complex in Costa Rica be ethical, or not? Why do you think so?
12. If the Carlson Company decides to proceed with the hotel development, what steps can it take to assure that the company remains in compliance with the code of conduct it has signed?
