Distinguish science from pseudoscience by identifying empirical approaches and evaluation of data as opposed to the use of anecdote or opinion.

Description

This assignment is a case study based on current events. It is composed of an introduction followed by four

parts, with 11 questions in total for you to answer.

Objectives-

In completing this assignment, you will:

• Reinforce the steps of the scientific method.

• Distinguish science from pseudoscience by identifying empirical approaches and evaluation of

data as opposed to the use of anecdote or opinion.

• Recognize the use of incorrect terminology, inaccurate information, and bias in social media

postings.

• Learn basic vaccine principles including composition and immune response by recipient

• Understand the significance of herd immunity as it impacts the public health

Directions. To complete this assignment, you need to:

• Create a new word document to answer all questions in complete sentences. Responses given as

incomplete sentences will lose credit for that question.

• Number each of your answers 1-11. Do not re-write the question you are answering. The TA grading

your assignment will not hunt for answers if your just submit one long run-on paragraph containing

responses to all 11 questions. Any response(s) not clearly number 1-11 will lose credit.

*BEFORE submitting, make sure all the instructions are followed**

**CHECK rubric before submitting**

**Watch all the video links and articles**

**Reference page is NOT needed for this assignment**