What consequences do you think such an implant would have on equality, personal autonomy, and unity (or wholeness) in love?
Given what you say above, explain whether the Love Implant interfere with, support, or be inconsequential for erotic love from the perspective of any 3 theorists we have discussed this semester. Be specific and provide substantive explanations. Do not use quotes from these theories (nor copy anything verbatim from my powerpoint slides), but instead, simply use their ideas (you don’t need to cite them).
What impact, if any, is getting such an implant likely to have on your identity? Reference either Rousseau or Nozick (or both) in your answer (you don’t need to agree with them to talk about their ideas).
If you already discussed this thinker is part (ii), then you would have only done so about love, not identity. Now you’re focused on identity. So, what you have to say about the thinker’s ideas should be substantially different in this part.
Do you, yourself, believe that the love implant would benefit erotic love? Be specific as to your reasons. [Please keep this to a very short paragraph]