Engage in a debate on strategic purpose of the firm: mission, purpose and value.
Critically discuss the paradox (responsibility vs profitability) in relation to strategy –Bring in relevant literature –e.g. Friedman (1970) vs Freeman and Reed (1983)
What are the most relevant pros and cons of each view? Support with examples
How is it done in practice? Discuss stakeholder mapping
Can both views be correct? Can both views be wrong? Why?
Draw critical implications from your analysis PART b)What is commonly understood as CSR? Any issues surrounding how we define it?
Page 4
What are the pros and cons of CSR regulation? Use examples and theory critically
What are the pros and cons of ethical self-regulation? Use examples and theory critically
Any merits to “creating shared value” (Porter and Kramer 2006)? Use examples.
Conclude with your views on the long-run success of each approach (critical in