Does answering such criticisms lead you to alter or revise your initial argument-In which way?

Which global climate policy is the most robust?

Main task: Final individual assignment on Callies and Moellendorf’s text (attached). You are to familiarize Yourself with the text and answer the question (which is made up of several sub-questions). You must support your argument with at least three authoritative outside sources that you reference correctly.

Question: According to you, which global climate policy is the most robust (i.e. has the strongest justifications)? Formulate three solid objections to this policy and answer them. Does answering such criticisms lead you to alter or revise your initial argument? In which way?