Why do you think the person was innocent and what should the government have done to rectify the issues?

Discussion forum

Ethics in Homeland Security class

This week, we discuss wrongful convictions and ethical, or unethical, the conduct of the government.

Your discussion says:

For this discussion post, you will list an example of an innocent person, what happened, and their background.

Discuss the background of your chosen case and the issues within that case. Why do you think the person was innocent and what should the government have done to rectify the issues? You may use any reliable resources, such as .gov, to argue your points.

The initial thread must contain at least 250 words.

Your reading makes it seem as if you should pick a case from Guantanamo.The discussion says, “..what should the government have done to rectify the issues?” Was their unethical conduct? Or what ethical conduct could have made the situation right? It’s possible they were acting in good faith, but later learned of information that could point toward the person’s innocence. Ethically, what is the government’s responsibility here?

You can choose any case, not just something from Guantanamo. Mention something about ethics though. Here are a few articles that may help you get started:

https://repository.belmont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=clj

https://www.postandcourier.com/news/new-ethics-rule-requires-prosecutors-to-turn-over-evidence-in-wrongful-convictions/article_6c475e8c-0023-11ec-b011-c7ea65359e06.html

https://ethicsinsociety.stanford.edu/events/when-witness-recants-legal-and-ethical-duties-arising-wrongful-convictions

https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2021/08/09/preventing-wrongful-conviction-a-judges-ethical-obligation/?slreturn=20220311221852

For this discussion post, you will list an example of an innocent person, what happened, and their background.

Discuss the background of your chosen case and the issues within that case.

Why do you think the person was innocent and what should the government have done to rectify the issues? You may use any reliable resources, such as .gov, to argue your points.