What evidence was effective for abolishing the Electoral College?

Purpose: With a controversial presidential election in recent history (2016), the role of the Electoral College is often cited regarding the outcome as Donald Trump lost the popular vote but won the Electoral College majority. A handful of other elections throughout history 1824, 1876, 1888, and 2000 had the same outcome. Political passions tend to flare when this happens.

The purpose of this assignment is to perform research about the Electoral College and engage in discussion as to whether it should remain part of the U.S. Constitution and political system.

This assignment will help you understand the purpose of the Electoral College as well as the controversies surrounding it as you formulate an opinion in answering the following questions:

What are the arguments in support of the Electoral College? What are the arguments against the Electoral College? And either way, what does it all mean for voters?

Lesson Outcomes

Examine fundamental political processes, institutions, actors and ideas (CLO 1)

Critically evaluate major arguments in the discipline. (CLO 2)

Effectively debate major arguments in both oral and written forms. (CLO 3)

Perceive how factors such as race, gender, ethnicity, class, and region influence political narratives. (CLO 4)

Analyze major political events and historical political figures. (CLO 5)

Printable Directions for this Assignment (PDF)- Alternative Formats
Steps for Completing the TaskSteps for Completing the Task

Step 1: Research

Read about the Electoral College in the textbook (Chapter 7, pages 266 – 268).
Watch the following videos:
Federalist Paper 68 Explained
How the Electoral College Works
The Trouble with the Electoral College

Read the following article from the Issues & Controversies database
(you might be prompted for your TCC login to access the article)
Electoral College: Should the United States continue to use the Electoral College in presidential elections?

Note Taking Tip: Take notes as you read. Since you know you are reading about two sides of issue, one way to take notes is to have a page for the “for” side and a page for the “against” side. As you read, you can make note of unique perspectives, facts, and/or events that each side uses for evidence to support their viewpoint.

Step 2: Analyze and Evaluate

Consider both sides of the argument. What evidence was effective for supporting the Electoral College? What evidence was effective for abolishing the Electoral College?

Based on the information you studied, how would you respond to the following questions?

What are the arguments in support of the Electoral College (or why should we keep the Electoral College what are the benefits?)?

What are the arguments against the Electoral College (or why should we abolish the Electoral College?

Do you support or oppose the Electoral College? Why? What are the implications for voters either way?

Step 3: Analyze and Explain

3. Write a 150-250 word paragraph explain your reasoning regarding your stance on the Electoral College.

Use evidence from the reading to explain the reasoning on your perspective.

Acknowledge valid arguments (points) from both sides

Write your paragraph on a Word document. Save the document to your computer as a back-up copy.

Refresher: How to Write an Argument Paragraph
Writing paragraphs for political science papers is just like writing paragraphs for an English essay. Political science professors expect well-developed, evidence-based information in their paragraphs and papers, too.
Complete this short online refresher on how to write an argument paragraph.

Step 4: The Discussion

Post your paragraph in the Unit 2: Electoral College discussion forum.
Copy your paragraph from your Word document and paste in the discussion forum.
Respond to a minimum of two classmates
Respond to someone who shares the same perspective as you do.
Respond to someone who has a different perspective than you do.
Your responses should be 50 to 100 words.
Provide a thoughtful response – analyze and evaluate their points and provide additional support or counter arguments from the readings.