What changes do you propose? Be as specific as possible. Explain exactly what changes you would make, so there’s no ambiguity, confusion, or unanswered questions

This semester, you will write two papers in which you identify a problem in the representation of a particular group in media (related to gender for paper 2, and race for paper 3) and describe what you think would be a more positive or healthy portrayal. For example, you might identify a TV show that reinforces stereotypes about women as unintelligent and passive, and describe how the show could be revised to challenge this stereotype.
This paper involves a five step process: 1) identification of the cultural artifact; 2) discussion of applied concepts; 3) critique of ideologies; 4) de/reconstruction of the popular cultural artifact so that ideologies in original popular cultural artifact are subverted; and 5) interpretation of and reasoning behind reconstruction.
Template for Media Literacy Paper 1 (gender):
Identify the artifact
What type of media is it? (Book, TV show, etc)
Genre?
Premise? Basic “thing” the show is about?
Applied concepts
What is gender?
Other concepts from the course that are relevant to part 3 of your paper: define them (For example: objectification, hegemonic masculinity, “superwoman ideal,” etc)
Remember: use in-text APA citations for the readings, as well as a reference list at the end of the paper.
You MUST cite at least one paper from this course (for example, the “Doing Gender” piece may be useful for you). You can cite papers from outside of this course as well. Your citation must be relevant to your argument.
Critique of the ideologies
One paragraph per claim you make
Topic sentence: something like “Star Trek portrays many of the female characters as sex objects.”
Evidence: “Seven of Nine wears a tight-fitting catsuit.”
Reasoning: “This outfit was designed specifically to emphasize her body shape as much as possible. In fact, it was so tight that the actress, Jeri Ryan, fainted during filming [APA STYLE CITATION HERE]. Further, there is no practical explanation for why she would wear this costume instead of a Star Fleet uniform or more loose-fitting clothing. In this way, the show presents Seven of Nine in a way that focuses on her sex appeal, in a way that is decontextualized from anything her personality or job duties.”
Additional evidence to support the claim (can be in new paragraph if needed): “Similarly, Deana Troi’s costumes were designed to emphasize her beauty and body shape.”
Reasoning for the evidence you described in “e”
De/reconstruction:
What changes do you propose? Be as specific as possible. Explain exactly what changes you would make, so there’s no ambiguity, confusion, or unanswered questions
Remember: your changes should reverse the ideology being described above. So,
How does this subvert the original ideology?
What is the new message that you are sending?
APA format is required
Do not use informal language (slang, vulgar language)
Do not use contractions (don’t, can’t, etc)
Do not quote. Instead, put it in your own words
Do not refer to yourself in this paper. No “In my opinion” or “I think”

Grading:
Grading scheme:

A: You define your terms in a way that really shows you understand them. You make claims about the ideology that are well-supported with evidence, and you lay out your reasoning very clearly and explicitly. Your writing is very specific and is detailed enough that I can tell you know what you’re talking about. There are no unanswered questions or unclear terms, and everything makes sense.

B: You make claims that are clearly supported by evidence and describe how you would subvert the original message in a way that is clear and specific. However, there may be some gaps in your reasoning, or your description of the ideology may be superficial (“The show sends the message that women are less than” when it would be more specific to say “The show sends the message that women belong in domestic spaces but not the workplace.”) Writing conventions may be weaker than in the A range.

C: Similar to B range, but one of the sections is excessively brief or vague, and some of your terms may go undefined.

D: If you do not follow directions or if your paper does not meet the standard for C work, you will be given the opportunity to redo it for up to a C.