Have you ever heard someone use a “color-blind” reference when the topic of cultural differences comes up? From one perspective, the idea that we are all the same speaks to our shared humanity, regardless of our biopsychosocial characteristics; while this is true at some level, another perspective that suggests a therapist could take a “color-blind” approach to clinical work is problematic. While the intention may be to focus on equality and all that we hold in common as people, the danger is in failing to recognize and account for the impact of our biopsychosocial characteristics on our experiences. Included, then, would be a message that invalidates the injustices that marginalized communities or groups face based on those differences. Identity is a complex phenomenon, and each one of us possesses a range of biopsychosocial characteristics, such as gender, race, ethnic origin, sexual orientation, and cognitive and physical abilities that impact how we view ourselves and how we are viewed. In fact, aspects of our identity, such as being able-bodied, young, or straight may result in automatic or unearned privileges. And, at the same time, other aspects of our identity, such as being brown, female, or Jewish may result in our marginalization.
Discussion Prompt
Self-awareness has been described as an important part of one’s therapeutic identity and key aspects of sound clinical practice, in general (Aponte& Kissil, 2018), and as it pertains to gaining cultural competence (Laszloffy & Habekost, 2010). Laszloffy & Habekost (2010) aptly state more specifically that in order for MFTs-in-training to be culturally competent “…the capacity to learn about others is rooted in how much individuals are able to understand about, and struggle with, themselves (p. 336). An integral part of this process, then, is an invitation for an inward examination of how contextual variables, like race, gender, and sexual orientation, for example, inform our personal belief systems and relationships.
Your initial post for this discussion should address two main parts, personal reflection and MAKSS reflection.
Part 1: Personal Reflection
Consider your own biopsychosocial characteristics and how more visible or salient aspects of your identity have resulted in experiences of affirmation or marginalization.
Reflect on your reaction to exploring the impact of your biopsychosocial characteristics on your own and your family’s experience.
Describe what thoughts and feelings come up as you consider the ways in which you have been privileged and/or marginalized.
Part 2: MAKSS Reflection
Discuss your MAKSS results and include your thoughts and reactions.
How do the results make sense, based on your lived experiences as described in the first part of the discussion?
What surprised you (or didn’t surprise you) about your results and why?