Survey on Radio Frequency Identification Security and Attacks
1- The paper presents a review of the uses of RFID in the healthcare sector. Since it is a review paper,Some sections, for example, have very long sentences. Figures are not referred to in the text. Also, were these figures made by the authors?
2- find that the paper is not cohesive.. How are the attacks impacting the applications and the other way around?
3- The systematic review must be expanded. First, if it is systematic, it is necessary to describe how the review was conducted and the decisions that were made to select to papers. Also, it seems to me that there should be way more papers describing RFID applications than the ones described here. This is fine, but the authors should make this clear. First, rather than “systematic”,Third, the authors should identify the venues that are more interesting.
4- Regarding the attacks, their description is very shallow and
5- Survey paper – only 19 references.This paper needs work to make it a true survey.Must be expanded…
6- This paper is a survey of RFIDand RFID attacks. Survey is acceptable for conferences, but this survey is somewhat weak regarding the discussion on dealing with the attacks.
7- The figures that are supposed to illustrate how the attacks work, but none of the figures was referred to in the text of the paper. Figure 3 is actually a table, but no explanation about the columns and the 5 difference schemes.
8- No discussion on the approaches to prevent these attacks nor to solve problems caused by the attacks after they have occurred. The only place that mentioned attack prevention is a very simple sentence in the Conclusion that is for general network security without mentioning anything specially for RFID security.
9- The paper presents a cursory survey on rfid security and possible attacks. There is no novel research contribution. The paper formatting is very strange and suggests little care from the authors’ side.