Pamphlet
FRAUNURS 6340
This is assignment consists of 2 Parts
Assignment Description: Part I Creating a Pamphlet or Web Page To complete this portion of the assignment the DNP–NA student evaluates a mental illness or
substance abuse issue that adversely affects individuals in an identified population. The student creates a pamphlet and/or (web page) that identifies and addresses gaps in health promotion/disease prevention educational care. The completed project should include information about current recommendations for health promotion and disease prevention in the
identified population. Remember there are two parts to this assignment Part 1– Creating a Pamphlet or Web Page and Part II– Peer Review. The portion of the assignment is due by Sunday, October 22, 2021 11:59 pm CST.
Assignment Description: Part II Peer Review
Peer review is an important process in graduate work and affords students the opportunity to collaborate during the learning process. Each student must have their Health Promotion Project Assignment peer reviewed by a fellow classmate. Additionally, each student must peer review a fellow classmates Health Promotion Project Assignment. All students will randomly be assigned to Peer Review by
How to complete the Peer Review:
1. Provide constructive, meaningful feedback on the assignment. The following
statements are examples of NON–constructive feedback: “I like your selected topic”
“Good Job” “Well written” “Poor quality”. The previous examples depict how NOT
to provide constructive feedback and student will not receive credit for the peer
review section of the assignment if they provide this type of feedback.
2. Provide constructive, meaningful feedback regarding the relationship between the
topic and health promotion. The following statements are examples of NON–
constructive feedback: “Great selection” “What” “Yes” “Poor quality”. The previous
examples depict how NOT to provide constructive feedback and the student will not
receive credit for the assignment if they provide this type of feedback.
3. The Peer Review process must occur to receive full credit.
Important: Course Instructors will review to assure that Peer evaluation is relevant and provides objective feedback, constructive criticism, and several recommendations for revisions with the focus on enhancing student presentations. The portion of the assignment is due by Sunday
FRAUNURS 6340
This is assignment consists of 2 Parts
Assignment Description: Part I Creating a Pamphlet or Web Page To complete this portion of the assignment the DNP–NA student evaluates a mental illness or
substance abuse issue that adversely affects individuals in an identified population. The student creates a pamphlet and/or (web page) that identifies and addresses gaps in health promotion/disease prevention educational care. The completed project should include information about current recommendations for health promotion and disease prevention in the
identified population. Remember there are two parts to this assignment Part 1– Creating a Pamphlet or Web Page and Part II– Peer Review. The portion of the assignment is due by Sunday, October 22, 2021 11:59 pm CST.
Assignment Description: Part II Peer Review
Peer review is an important process in graduate work and affords students the opportunity to collaborate during the learning process. Each student must have their Health Promotion Project Assignment peer reviewed by a fellow classmate. Additionally, each student must peer review a fellow classmates Health Promotion Project Assignment. All students will randomly be assigned to Peer Review by
How to complete the Peer Review:
1. Provide constructive, meaningful feedback on the assignment. The following
statements are examples of NON–constructive feedback: “I like your selected topic”
“Good Job” “Well written” “Poor quality”. The previous examples depict how NOT
to provide constructive feedback and student will not receive credit for the peer
review section of the assignment if they provide this type of feedback.
2. Provide constructive, meaningful feedback regarding the relationship between the
topic and health promotion. The following statements are examples of NON–
constructive feedback: “Great selection” “What” “Yes” “Poor quality”. The previous
examples depict how NOT to provide constructive feedback and the student will not
receive credit for the assignment if they provide this type of feedback.
3. The Peer Review process must occur to receive full credit.
Important: Course Instructors will review to assure that Peer evaluation is relevant and provides objective feedback, constructive criticism, and several recommendations for revisions with the focus on enhancing student presentations. The portion of the assignment is due by Sunday