1. What is the ‘interpretive’ method in legal theory, as developed by Ronald Dworkin? Why does Dworkin think it is a form of anti-positivism? Do you find it convincing?
Tag Archives: anti-positivism
Ronald Dworkin’s theory of law is often characterised as a form of anti-positivism. Does it offer a genuine alternative to legal positivism?Discuss
Description Ronald Dworkin’s theory of law is often characterised as a form of anti-positivism. Does it offer a genuine alternative to legal positivism? -Cover Dworkins theory of law both in the Model of rules 1 and 2 – How contradicts Harts theory – Looks at the differences in both Harts and Dworkins theory
