Answer the following questions. 1. What was said in the inquiry of the Guy Paul Morin case? What type of evidence was under examination? 2. What alternative language can be used in place of “consistent with” and what is the purpose of rephrasing?
Answer the following questions. 1. What was said in the inquiry of the Guy Paul Morin case? What type of evidence was under examination? 2. What alternative language can be used in place of “consistent with” and what is the purpose of rephrasing?