Describe the difference between the two cases based on the information you are given. Do you agree with how the Court distinguished these two cases?

Description Discussion Question 3-1: On page 209, our textbook briefly describes a case called Warden v. Hayden. In note 4 on page 218, our book discusses the case of Welsh v. Wisconsin. Briefly describe the difference between the two cases based on the information you are given. Do you agree with how the Court distinguished […]

Critically discuss how English Law strikes a balance between the competing interests of those investing in companies, considering the effects of limited liability on shareholders vs various types of creditors.

Critically discuss how English Law strikes a balance between the competing interests of those investing in companies, considering the effects of limited liability on shareholders vs various types of creditors.

What standards would you add to the current expert witness standards set forth in The Federal Rules of Evidence to prevent individuals from testifying beyond their scope of expertise?Discuss

Description 1. Consider the assertion: “Judges can distinguish between good science/scientific evidence and junk science/scientific evidence to accurately determine evidence admissibility thanks to cases like Frye and Daubert (and the latter’s ‘progeny,’ General Electric and Kumho).” a. Do you agree or disagree? b. Do you think that the standards set forth in these court cases […]

What interest in the land, if any, might Stephane be entitled to?Assuming she does have a proprietary interest, how would you advise her to protect it against a potential new purchaser of the land?Discuss

What interest in the land, if any, might Stephane be entitled to? Assuming she does have a proprietary interest, how would you advise her to protect it against a potential new purchaser of the land? Assuming Stephane does have a proprietary interest, if the relationship did come to an end, would she be able to […]

What standards would you add to the current evidence admissibility standards set forth in Daubert to make evidence admissibility requirements more robust? Explain why you would add each of these additional standards.Discuss

Description 1. Consider the assertion: “Judges can distinguish between good science/scientific evidence and junk science/scientific evidence to accurately determine evidence admissibility thanks to cases like Frye and Daubert (and the latter’s ‘progeny,’ General Electric and Kumho).” a. Do you agree or disagree? b. Do you think that the standards set forth in these court cases […]

Discuss “The courts endeavour to update the principles of equity so that they are relevant to contemporary commercial realities. However, it is not an easy task- and certain issues are perhaps not as settled as they should be.” Using the UK Law,with relevance to * Breach of trust [OR] * Third party liability [OR] * Tracing.

“The courts endeavour to update the principles of equity so that they are relevant to contemporary commercial realities. However, it is not an easy task- and certain issues are perhaps not as settled as they should be.” Using the UK Law, discuss with relevance to * Breach of trust [OR] * Third party liability [OR] * Tracing.

Analyze Criminology:Transnational Organised and Corporate crime.

Description the subject I am studying is criminology and the module is Transnational Organised and Corporate crime. it is a 3000 word essay which needs to be referenced in a Harvard way. I have attached my introduction so it gives an insight of what needs to be done and notes based around the essay.