Identify an area of law where the application is not as practically effective as it should be and then propose an alternative

Law review and reform Identify an area of law where the application is not as practically effective as it should be and then propose an alternative, and critique the relative merits of the existing law versus the proposed new law as regards practical issues such as effectiveness, cost, efficiency, clarity and transparency.

Describe the merits of the point. What elements of the point do you see as valid? Who in your own audience might agree with this opposing source and why?

With your specific argument stance (thesis/claim) in mind, locate one scholarly source with opinions that do not agree with your own stance. Using Toulmin’s model, demonstrate the use of concession and refutation to rebut an opposing viewpoint, keeping in mind the importance of a humble yet assertive tone. Steps: In 2-3 rich paragraphs, answer the […]

Critically discuss.The distinction between merits and judicial review is elusive, confusing, and difficult to apply to the problems that actually arise in administrative law disputes.

Question: ‘The distinction between merits and judicial review is elusive, confusing, and difficult to apply to the problems that actually arise in administrative law disputes.’ Critically discuss. Must use AGLC referencing style.